Live Chat 6 PM to 9 PM EST
ONE VOICE Chat Community
VSO's Generally
More Sabotage Disguised As A "Well Developed Claim"|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
Before I start my outting of this
new subject, Activists UNITE! --- the writing is on the wall that the days are numbered before and END finally nears with VSO's doing disability claims for Veterans, and not a minute too soon either. 2 new Bills making it's way through the House and Senate have delivered up 3 new Legal Tests for claims to meet, and these are pre-mandated to remove the "discretionary" powers away from both VA Raters and VSO's alike. S. 2825, alternately called "The 10 percent Rule" firmly establishes a minimum of a 10% service connected rating for claims, where the Veterans are already receiving Pharmacy for their medical conditions which are under the ruling application before the VARO and BVA. No IF's, AND's, or BUTTS!! (ha ha) If you are getting VA or private medical Pharmacy for your medical conditions, then you will automatically walk into a 10% rating minimum, and you can tell the VA Raters to Shut Up And Sit Down!!!! O-O-O-O-R-R-A-A-A-H-H !! Whew! Thank you Congress for that moment of Wisdom! Secondly, SECTION 109 of the new House Bill HR 5892 establishes an all new law not yet on the books, 38 USCA 1156 which goes one step further to pre-define a 50% rating AND a 100% rating too by firmly fixing their own Legal Test of what unemployability is and whether or not an injury is "healed" or "not healed", regardless with the emphasis and focus placed upon IMPAIRMENT. Woo-Hoo, YEAH BABY!!! Don't Ya Just Love It? Both of these Bills will likely pass for no other reason that they are both submitted by the Committees themselves. HR 5892 is already out of Committee and before the full House. But this is not without it's embedded controversies attached and it is here that the topic arises of Sabotaged claims for Veterans all in the name of the scheming, predatory, and false interests of VSO "Clubs". We have aggressively taken issue with this and I have directly begun getting right into the faces of the White House and Dept. of Justice on it, and I'll take a minute here to rake it over the coals with ya so you can see what the crisis is. HR 5892 holds an alternate clause of EVIL to Veterans known as SECTION 107. This clause has shown up in other Bills, we have always entered Oppositions on it in past years, but because of the Fraud nature of the clause in this years Bill, I decided to Bump Up our game on the Opposition. First, the entirety of the HR 5892 is rooted in the Findings and Recommendations of the VDBC Commission. Secondly, SECTION 107 is NOT a part of the VDBC recommendations. So this is the first point of False Pretense and Fraud that arises in the Bill. Looking back to find out where this SECTION 107 has been also deceptively applied, the answer comes up it has almost always been applied by largely Republican Bills. The same is true here, because HR 5892 in it's entirety was largely driven by Republican Doug Lamborn, by reason of their very own open Bragging on webcasted hearings. During my January trip to DC and meeting in the VA Secretary's Office, I had a time gap to fill between appointments and wound up having a 2 hour meeting with Steve Robertson of American Legion at the HQ office. I also had, what I thought to be a process set into motion for the Albany Office of American Legion, via one Alton Carpenter, to take over the Fort McClellan Veterans group and to start the claims and legislative side of that advocacy through the Legion so that I could move on to other things here at Vets For Justice. That effort fell through, and I will talk now, for the first time, about the crap out of that effort and why SECTION 107 is a part of the Claims Crisis of what is going on with Veterans and their cases. It was found first, American Legion was only and exclusively obsessed and pre-occupied on the one and sole issue of MEMBERSHIP with the Legion. I was sent on a royal rat chase, first from Albany then to Washington and then finally to Woodstock New York and in the end, all of these Legion offices point to each other and wind up in an argument between themselves without ever being concerned about Vet DEATHS while they are all standing around and bullshitting time away. I was promised that at their next state annual meeting, that a Resolution would be submitted on the Fort McClellan issue so they could then "work the issue" through the Legion system. This was never done, nor was I told anything about the change. The truth is, American Legion is operated by a bunch of Old White Men who refuse to go home to their wives, and are too dumb, too dysfunctional, too incompetent, and too self-absorbed to be of any service at all to Veterans at large. In the 2 hour meeting in DC, Robertson started jamming down my throat this little catch-phrase of "a well developed claim". In fact when I returned to Albany, we went on to argue between ourselves for the next 3 consecutive days by email back and forth on this very issue. The concept of the "well developed claim", which is exactly what SECTION 107 is all about and why we are Opposing it, is a VSO championed phrase. Without this phrase in place, the entire VSO claims industry will crumble like the Wall of Berlin and the Fall of Communism itself. Veterans DO need to get a clue about the hazards of this catch-phrase that they are all floating around. The VSO system itself is heavily rooted in the concepts of Extortion and False Pretense. The idea is to FORCE Veterans to MEMBER these Clubs under the idea that they have skilled, licensed attorneys for the Veterans. Then it's only after they PAY membership fees that they are told that all they get is just some other sick guy who lives up the street and has no professional licensure in the practice of law whatsoever. Nor are the Veterans told in advance that these VSO's refuse to help the most complicated of cases because, by their own admission, they are too dumb and unqualified to handle the complexities of the case. There is an entire population of Veterans who are not helped at all by VSO's. Then if the VSO's do bungle the case for Veterans, the Veterans have no statutory remedy in place to file for the recovery of damages. So THERE !! Get it???? SECTION 107 of HR 5892 seeks to "expedite" or accellerate any "well developed claims" ahead of all other Veterans regardless of how long those Veterans have been entrapped in the system backlog. What the meaning is of a "well developed claim" is also a problem, using my own case and experiences as an example, having been in the system now for 36 years with no rating at this date. It seems that when I submit my own Army Hospital Records, the VARO and BVA hops from one excuse to another why those records will not be allowed into the record. The most common abuse is the so-called "new and material evidence" rule. If they bungle the case the first time, then the "new and material evidence rule" is then applied to block the Veteran from making any corrections. Get it?? However, this all changes if a VSO "Club" extortionately obtains a "power of attorney" designation and the Veteran is now forced to pay a MEMBER FEE to the "Club". The VSO "Club" can submit the very same papers that I just finished submitted, and by reason of the PAID MEMBER FEE, now all of a sudden, BVA and VARO grows a brain and allows those same Army Hospital Records into the claim. For 36 years, the VA has written my case in an endless chain of denials to refuse allowing my evidence papers into the record, and each deliberately falsified ruling is carefully constructed to suggest that there is either something WRONG with these papers or as if there is something WRONG with my ability to submit them. You can trust me when I say, I am submitting them exactly the way that the VSO's are submitting them because I own the exact same training books that the VSO's purchase in their training process. To that end, the question is asked: "what is actually different between me submitting my own evidence papers and the VSO's??" The answer is but two things: (1) the VA Raters are looking for my payment of FEES to the VSO "Club" AND (2) the VA Raters are looking for my "title" as a VSO. In other words, the VA Raters are deliberately trashing fully legitimate Vet claims on the simple extortion practice of them not paying MEMBER FEES to VSO's. If all of this Nonsense To Nowhere is not enough for you, then let's talk about the Ultimate Injustice that lurks inside this very HOAX of a doctrine called "well developed claims" and it is here that you will get the much larger meaning of just how fraudulent and malpracticed this whole SECTION 107 really is. The first and basic concept of a "well developed claim" was first used in a ruling decision by the Court of Veterans Appeals in a case back in the 1980's involving Veterans who had NO military medical records AT ALL, and then also, presented with medical conditions LONG AFTER HIS MILITARY SERVICE. The case was dubious at best. This Veteran and "his representatives" went into a multi-year Odessey of standing on his head and doing cartwheels to develop OUTSIDE EVIDENCE which would, in the end, basically Fabricate the legitimacy of the claim. This included faker "testimony" from his military buddies, which nobody else could substantiate in the documents, and contrived doctor statements which were based on what they were told by the lawyers etc. It was a batch of ridiculous and contrived ALTERNATE EVIDENCE even based on his "life story". The CVA then eventually ruled on the many appeals that came up in the case, that the Veteran had submitted a "well developed claim" and should be allowed to proceed as a service connected award. Of course, this is all bullshit, and part of the Ole Boys way of doing things which is intended to shut out us Girls cases but for the sake of articulating and describing to all of you what the details of this Extortion scheme really is, then I muck through it to you now for complete examination of what this crap is all about. Once you understand this very CHUNK of what the "well developed claim" is premised upon, then I can take you here to the very next level of understanding of what is actually happening in the claims system. By the very meaning of this whole idea of a "well developed claim", the VA has taken the position that every single Veterans case ought to be a "well developed claim". This is to mean, completely DISREGARD the factual and actual PROVEN evidence in the case such as military records, and then to adjudicate the Veterans case based on his or her "life story" and alternate fabricated "evidences" such as Stand-On-Your-Head rat chasing that goes on for YEARS to first get this statement from a buddy, and then get another statement from your frigging PEDIATRICIAN and then another doctor who passed through your life and cannot even remember you and so on and so on. GET IT !!! So they are using and abusing this catch-phrase of "well developed claim" to perpetuate the wholly UNNEEDED and UNNECESSARY infinity of claims processed at VSO "Clubs", in exchange for the payment of Forced-membered FEE PAYMENTS, and then bleeding the Veterans dry of time and irrelevant CONTENT to the case to FORCE the Veteran to deliver these many destinations of Alternate evidences, with a complete disregard for the basic and factual evidences which are already AT HAND, which is --- the Veterans military SICK CALL records, his or her ENTRANCE Physical records, and his or her EXIT Physical records. Putting it another way, those of us Veterans who have clear, immediate, and OVERT service connectability by reason of in-service and active duty medical treatment records, are then FORCED to subordinate and subject ourselves to a different Evidence standard which is intended for those Veterans who have NO records at all for in-service treatment. GET IT?????? This is a heavily orchestrated FRAUD and EXTORTION scheme that lurkes between the legislative commitees, the VA Raters, and the VSO "Clubs". Once your eyes become opened to the size and scope of the INJUSTICE of all this sad and illegal CRAP, you will then know what to do to put on an Effective OPPOSITION to these lame and sorry clauses such as SECTION 107 inside of HR 5892. It is an exercise of Sabotage and Unnecessity and even Irrelevance to go down this road of alternate evidencing and probing a Veterans life story when he or she already has military hospital and treatment records fixed into place right at the time of the claim itself. The combined effects of the 2 Bills, S. 2825 and HR 5892, on the one hand, tries to take away now, a chunk of the discretionary powers of the VA raters and will have a side effect of eliminating parts of these Extortion scheme by fixing and mandating NEW legal tests for the VA Raters to answer to as I have clearly stated in the top part of this Chat. On the other hand, howerver, SECTION 107 is an attempt to hold onto old ways and old plays with the Ole Boys hoaxes which have been permitted to creep into the system, and it is the root of all frauds and schemes which keeps the VSO "Clubs" in business with FORCED and EXTORTED payments for member dues which are in all other ways, not even necessary. These Extorionate VSO's are only doing what Veterans themselves can do which is to submit their own papers for proofing. But it's the VA Raters and CVA appeals court, who is falsifying the ruling documents to force the Veterans to PAY MEMBER DUES to the VSO's so that the VA Raters can submit and then have the very SAME evidence papers allowed into the record. GET IT ????? I rest my case. In the final end, there were NO services provided to either me or the Fort McClellan Veterans and I fully withdrew any attempt to reach out to American Legion by reason of their complete disregard for the critical health concerns of the sickest of our members. In short, American Legion was preoccupied with preservation of PROCESS (instead of "challenging" it) and the payment of FEES. By the very way and manner which which the doctrine of a "well developed claim" is applied and abused, it is intended to OUT, probe, examine, publish, and talk about all other aspects of the Veterans lives which are fully PROTECTED by law in the first place by the PRIVACY ACT of 1974. The VSO's through all of their incompetence and bungling, are effectively forcing Veterans to testify "against themselves" by bringing in other irrelevant parts of their private lives, including their lives before and after military service as an integral part of the VA Claims Adjudication process. To that end, we stand OPPOSED to this Travesty Of No-Justice and we encourage all other and new Veterans coming in to do the very same. This message has been edited. Last edited by: McClellanVet, Sue Frasier, VEV 1970 Army Signal Corps national activist/protester staff Blogger, VFJ |
||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Live Chat 6 PM to 9 PM EST
ONE VOICE Chat Community
VSO's Generally
More Sabotage Disguised As A "Well Developed Claim"
