Live Chat 6 PM to 9 PM EST
ONE VOICE Chat Community
NATO & The U.N.
Should U.S. Leave NATO?|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
The recent and untimely crisis
of the Middle East, and the relentless outbreaks of this and that involving Israel really does force the question of whether it is now time for the U.S. to leave NATO and possibly the U.N. altogether. As I have said in previous Blogs, the very concept of NATO is ill-conceived because it relies heavily upon the U.S. as the key player of wealth to police and rescue and be arbitrator for the relief and aid packages which, in theory, are supposed to lure, entice, persuade, or otherwise fix by negotiations the dysfunctions of world mishaps. This is fine, well, and good from a pair of Utopian eyeglasses, but the reality check is, whenever the financial boat is rocked by too many riders, or is paddling in too many different directions, and the pot of taxpayer gold is stretched to its limits, then this theory from La-La-Land starts to collapse and the roadmap to U.S. ruins really does come to bear. Just how many "things" are we going to allow ourselves to be sucked into before the White House says "Enough already!!" and either revises NATO to limit the U.S. role and burdens, or to leave NATO outright as a member? With Iraq going to hell in a handbasket, and Afghanistan popping up from time to time, and North Korea floating missiles past our noses, and Hezbollah yanking everybody's chain, at what point does the U.S. taxpayer cut a break and get a voice in whether we should have to continue pandering to all the Obsessive Compulsive Disorders of the world? Perhaps it is now for the U.S. to turn its big budget relief guns back to our very own people as a priority and let someone else worry about the NATO 3-ring circus in the East until we can take care of our own. This country has put out the false charade of Johnny WarBucks way, way, way too long in the foreign lands afar and it only stands to reason that to save our land first should now become the new course of correction. Staying the course into a money pit with no clear ability to steer into the ends that we were originally hoping for does seem to be increasingly a failed dream of the past. This is not to say that the cause of Iraq and the other international pursuits were not valid -- for sure at the beginning they all were. But getting real, just how many directions can we be pulled in over ethnicity obsessions, religion obsessions, and type of government obsessions without it draining our own resources and tax base completely dry? NATO and the U.N. have both outlived themselves in usefulness and for the U.S. to continue as the Superman of nations is not exactly a pursuit in the best interests of our taxpaying citizens. Just ask New Orleans. Sue Frasier, VEV 1970 Army Signal Corps national activist/protester staff Blogger, VFJ |
||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Live Chat 6 PM to 9 PM EST
ONE VOICE Chat Community
NATO & The U.N.
Should U.S. Leave NATO?
