Well you've seen my public hearing appearance
below at the House Veterans Affairs Committee
so now here are more evidences.

Ron Abrams has a controlling voice in both
the Veterans Pro Bono Consortium, which
receives federal funding from the Court
of Veterans Appeals to provide free lawyers
to veterans, and at the National Veterans
Legal Services Project which is nothing
more than a publishing firm who tries
to SELL books to poverty stricken veterans
who are desperate to push through their
disability claims.

It seems that crackpot Ron got caught with
his pants down when MY case came along
with the system.

Here is your heads up everybody: -----
Ron Abrams only considers what the VA
says in case reviews. He will NOT let
you send in YOUR side of the case
and what the arguments are. If you try
and do that, ole Ron will then accuse
you of having a "controlling" personality.

The truth is, it is completely contrary
to the Bar Assocation standards for
practice of law to ONLY and EXCLUSIVELY
consider somebody elses position in
a litigation forum and NOT the client
who is asking for the representation.

What Ron does is turn the proverbial
tables on veterans, and get this, he
has done this for YEARS and gotten away
with it because the VSO's are too too
dumb and incompetent to have him prosecuted.

I did some digging and Ron is NOT a
member of the DC Bar Association, the
Virginia Bar Association, OR the Maryland
Bar Association. He "might" be a member
of the Federal Bar Association and
that one has NO attorney misconduct filing
process. They do NO policing of their
members whatsoever. So there ya go.

Pay close attention to Ron's email below
In His Own Words !! He clearly states
that he only reviews and considers what
the VA says and not what the Veteran
says when doing a veterans case review.

If you have been caught up in his scams
before yourself, then don't hesitate
to start filing gripes at the Internal
Revenue Service on his 2 organizations.

What is going on here is that Ron Abrams
has a fully MONOPOLY on all free lawyer
services on veterans claims, and then
he is using that under false pretenses
to represent the VA to the veterans
instead. So there ya go, I kid you not.

You all keep thinking that you are doing
something wrong in your cases, when the
truth is it's the very system you are
passing through that is corrupt, malpracticed,
and loaded up to the eyeballs with scams.

See Rons email to me below as we
were at the beginning process of
him reviewing my case. He was FIRED
by me a few days later and I hung up the
phone on him.

If this don't beat all and get yer attention
then I just don't know what will.




--- On Thu, 10/2/08, ron_abrams@nvlsp.org <ron_abrams@nvlsp.org> wrote:


From: ron_abrams@nvlsp.org <ron_abrams@nvlsp.org>
Subject: RE: Sue Frasier Case Review: Talking On BVA's Faker Story On VCAA Forms
To: suefrasier@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 12:59 PM


Sue,

Have you hired the private attorney you mentioned to me? If so, I need not review your documents. In any case, here is how our process works:


1. NVLSP reviews a copy of the BVA decision;

2. If we think there is a reasonable chance for a remand or reversal at the CAVC we will take the case for no cost to the appellant;

3. Of course, that means we do reject some cases;

4. If we win a remand we generally give the case back to the appellant to work with his or her local representative (their call).

Based on our conversations and your e mails I am not sure what you want. If you want to try and put VA officials in jail - then we cannot help you. If you want to try to obtain VA benefits then we may be able to help you. While we will review your legal theories and factual contentions, we can only work with the fixed record before the CAVC. By law the record is fixed (at the time of the BVA denial) and no new evidence can be introduced.

At this time - if you want us to have us review your case I need you to fax a copy of just the final BVA decision to me. 202 328 0063.

Sue,

I sense you are a powerful personality and you want to control things. It is your case and you have that right if you can find an attorney willing to follow your instructions.. . . But, that is not the way we work. We will review your case, explain why we want to take it to the Court (and what legal theories we will argue) and you can say yes or no.

Good luck

Ron

________________________________


No I did NOT misread
what he says here: I was thinking, just
like you might, that what he means
is he will review the entire case
and then make a decision on representation.
But what he is doing to me in this
email is holding me at bay and trying
to get me to stop sending in MY side
of the case. His explanation is he
only reviews and considers what the VA
says and it ends there. I confronted
him and said "this is completely NUTS"
and he began talking over me like a lunatic
schizaphrenic.

I am outraged and you should be too
so here ya have it everybody, another
Vet predator in the works who needs to be
fired without delay.

And oh by the way, YES the House Veterans
Committee does have this email for evidence.


__________________________________________
UPDATE NEWS:
TAKEN FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION
DISCIPLINARY ACTION DATABASE
__________________________________________


PUBLIC DISCIPLINE PUBLIC RESOURCES


Jan. 1 — Feb. 25, 2003
Philadelphia

The Supreme Court on Jan. 28 ordered Ronald B. Abrams suspended for 18 months, as recommended by the Disciplinary Board, and also placed on supervised probation for two years following the suspension. According to the disciplinary report, Abrams commingled and used client funds for his own benefit, failed to make prompt distribution of funds to clients and failed to maintain adequate balances in his trust accounts.

The court on Jan. 31 ordered Steven Clark Forman suspended for one year and one day. Justice Russell M. Nigro dissented in favor of a two-year suspension. A majority of the Disciplinary Board recommended a three-month suspension, while five members dissented in favor of recommending a suspension of one year and one day. The disciplinary report said that Forman failed to notify the Disciplinary Board or the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts that he had moved his office to New Jersey, that he failed to send in an annual statement or pay his annual fee and that after he was placed on inactive status he continued to practice for 12 years and also failed to comply with continuing legal education requirements.

The court on Jan. 31 ordered Ramon R. Obod suspended for one year, retroactive to March 19, 2001, as recommended by the Disciplinary Board. Justice Russell M. Nigro dissented in favor of a two-year suspension. According to the disciplinary report, Obod pleaded guilty in federal court to one count of making a false statement to a Securities and Exchange Commission investigator and was placed on temporary suspension on March 19, 2001.

Disbarments on Consent
The following attorneys have been disbarred on consent under a rule of disciplinary enforcement pertaining to resignations by attorneys under disciplinary investigation: Morton J. Gordon, Luzerne County, on Jan. 24, retroactive to Feb. 20, 2001; Clyde Crady Swisher III, Allegheny County, on Jan. 24, retroactive to June 8, 2001; Kevin Joseph Coffey, out of state, on Jan. 28; George David Sheehan Jr., Montgomery County, on Jan. 31; Philip C. Ursu, Indiana County, on Feb. 11; and Kenneth Charles Jones, Montgomery County, on Feb. 11.

Reciprocal Discipline
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has imposed reciprocal discipline on the following attorneys: Leon Lewis Vinokur, placed on temporary suspension, on Jan. 24, for like discipline imposed by the State of Delaware pending conclusion of disciplinary proceedings; Daniel Eban Berger, suspended for three months, on Jan. 28, for like discipline ordered by the Supreme Court of New Jersey; Michael G. Paul, suspended for three months, on Jan. 28, for like discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey; and Patrick H. McCarthy III, disbarred, on Feb. 11, for like discipline imposed by the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Mass.

___________________________________________
END of BAR ASSOCIATION POST On Ron Abrams

This message has been edited. Last edited by: McClellanVet,